Couples of month ago, I was going to National Mall to see an exhibition of Yoga, and I had gone through Metro Center station. I was amazed by all the advertisement. Information on all over Metro Center station regarding energy partner with Canada, the banners, neon signs, stickers on wall and floor not only that but also most of the pillars also covered by these display of the advertisement of gowithcanada.ca. After I saw that advertisement,
I was questioning myself that how much gasoline does America needs to run daily transportation? There was no doubt that 73% energy dependency could not fulfill a whole demand, so partnering with a neighbor may have more beneficial in this situation. Of the 27%, a total energy of US imported petroleum covers 57% that is a considerable number. If we see total energy consumption, a most significant piece of pie occupied by petroleum. It was definitely easy to keep promising with Canada far better off involving on the Middle East, but also counting math did not look complicated, when the US was seeking new ideas to tackle down own economic issue. Counting numbers of trade deficit when the US talked about the annual budget seeded utterly unfair.
Advocating for energy partners should have been the win-win situation. Profitable to both countries in several ways, especially economic benefit that should be a vital issue because the US mainly just have been consuming fuel that came from Canada. It is true that eventually some portion of imported fuel also goes to the production sector in the US. In the straightforward situation, the US has a tremendous amount of resource and reserve of oil, but how it’s been used should also be reviewed. In 2015 the USA will be a top country for producing oil among other oil producing countries. At that right time, how the US views itself about energy dependency? There is no other solution for energy consumption, but what will be the critical source of energy if it is needed to think about how it comes and when we need to use.Creating useful awareness for a campaign need target consumer, but derived from the particular groups like lobbyist also needs to head up to find out what is behind it. Many time lobbyists get a huge chunk of cash to run specific campaigns, and they try every means to achieve success, and when they fulfill what they intended, they have no interest on rest of aftermath outcomes rather than the programs that have monetary benefit. It is a complicated issue to tell that how many metro riders actively notice the campaign of gocanadawith.ca inside Metro Center. According to http://www.tbd.com a blog, among all metro rider 2% metro riders do not own any private vehicles, and surprisingly there is no any effectiveness study have done among the group of people about advertisements of the Metro Center. Uncertainty about the effectiveness of gocanadawith.ca has seemed very confident, and it reflects that gowithcanada.ca has tried to create some sort of phenomena among the DC metro riders which number approximately seven hundred thousand, but it has seemed pointless. As an unsuccessful campaign, do people who have access to DC metro – it is only one example – really care about US energy independent? The obvious point is that US energy independent is not an exciting issue for many metro riders even though 98% own private vehicles, so what question seems to raise is American care about how much energy we consume or how many people love to keep the US energy dependency under controllable point. If people believe and rely on politicians who are responsible for energy issue, people who choose those politicians must do brainstorm one more time before giving votes to them. That really makes sense that Democracy Start from You.
